May be the Puff Bar Aimed at Reducing the Addiction Potential of ELECTRIC CIGARETTES?
Puff Bar is a superb alternative to a traditional ice cream treat since it has none of the cons connected with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is really a simple sweet treat, that makes it a great option to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is manufactured with only natural flavors, so it is a healthy alternative for those who are watching their diet. Moreover, Puff Bar is easy to make, you can make it normally as you want without having to prepare the ice cream each and every time. It’s ideal for kids and for parties because you can serve.
Puff Bar is a relatively new product, which was developed to test people a reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. Whenever we smoke we have been exposing ourselves to thousands of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar does not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and also has zero calories. The manufacturers declare that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes because it is made from completely 100 % natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.
One of the biggest issues in public areas health today is obesity and diet. For this reason many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these products, they’re currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar claim that individuals who use their product to lose weight can easily do so when they only need to carry around the small product. The makers of Puff Bar are aware that since public health officials have already been calling for more information on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the general public wants to learn about Puff Bar and whether it poses a risk to public health.
By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they’re in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In line with the FDA any e-cigarette which has nicotine must contain an insert which allows one to put it into your mouth, because of this you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to take it where ever you might go. If the product also offers an extinguisher additionally it is in violation of regulations. The reason being that since there is no ash produced by a puff Bar e Cigarette it isn’t a valid device to use to refill an existing e cigarette with nicotine or to smoke another one.
Because the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the firms that produce puff bars claiming they have marketed their product in a way that is illegal. Along with sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request that they no longer make reference to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the company’s lawyers have suggested they call it a “tobacco alternative”.
What the legal team has done isn’t entirely surprising. The problem with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in the law. This is because there’s currently no law mandating that electric cigarettes need to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could start a flood of lawsuits that might be filed by municipalities that wanted to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting type of tobacco into the marketplace.
And also the possibility of a lawsuit being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes on the market could result in a reduction in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research shows that smokers who are presented with non-tobacco flavored e-cigs will replace those cigarettes with those that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to young people and to younger generations, this could substantially reduce the amount of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. Also it seems that the addition of the puff bar to a number of tobacco-flavored electric cigarettes could lead smokers to seek out “real” cigarettes rather than rely so heavily on an alternative solution that may not supply them with nicotine.
It appears that the UK government could have a point. There’s currently no requirement of tobacco companies to include warning labels on the products nor is there a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The thing that these products all have as a common factor is that they can not cause cancer or other diseases. It looks a question of economics that is being overlooked. A solution like the puff bar would seem just like a much better way to make money for tobacco companies because they are essentially podsmall.com creating products which are more difficult to consume, which means that fewer people will purchase them.